Energy Innovation’s July 2026 Energy Policy Simulator analysis, reported by Associated Press on October 1, projects that federal energy-policy changes since January 2025 will raise U.S. household energy spending — on the order of hundreds of dollars a year by the mid-2030s and a multi-thousand-dollar cumulative hit per household through 2040, with some states modeled near $9,000 cumulative. AP’s wire and the group’s own PDF both describe higher consumer costs and pollution impacts versus a prior-policy baseline; the model excludes Alaska and Hawaii for data reasons.

The study lands beside Trump’s midterm economy messaging and the Iran war’s effect on oil and diesel. Administration allies and industry groups typically dispute such models as over-weighting climate-rule rollbacks and under-counting production benefits; overnight attributes the dollar figures to Energy Innovation’s simulator, not as government forecasts. AP’s consumer angle is the confirmed news peg for Friday’s desk.

Backstory: household energy costs are already a midterm pressure point in the AP-NORC poll. This card is a model-and-wire story, not a new statute. Watch DOE or White House rebuttal documents, state PUC reactions, and whether Friday’s jobs print reframes the cost-of-living debate. Engage: energyinnovation.org report PDF; AP wire copies on ABC and local affiliates.

The model’s state-level spread matters for midterm messaging: AP noted higher cumulative hits in places such as Oregon, Mississippi, South Dakota, Virginia, and Wyoming under the group’s assumptions. Household bills also move with Iran-driven oil and diesel, so readers should separate war-risk fuel spikes from the think tank’s multi-year policy counterfactual. White House energy aides are expected to answer with production and deregulation talking points rather than a competing simulator dump on day one.